COMPARING
INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR IN REAL AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS.
Tula Giannini, Ph.D., M.L.S., M.M. Associate Professor, Pratt Institute (tulag@bellatlantic.net)
|
May 2, 2002 Lessons Learned at Dot-Com U.
|
|
Information Seeking Behavior (ISB) at the Crossroads of the Real and Virtual. ![]() Old patterns of ISB are being challenged and reconstructed to mirror changes in the very nature of information itself. Information
residing in cyberspace assumes new knowledge organizations and structures,
which are transforming the research landscape and ISB.
2 2 |
| How can information technology
bridge the conceptual divide facing
users as they move between online searching in the real and virtual?
In the Virtual, users are helped by smart search engines
and
|
| The Study: Comparing 3 variables at NYPL and SIBL;
the
survey
Research Experience: User perspective of the research experience Research Environment: Environmental elements and factors relevant to place and information architecture. ![]() |
|
4a
|
|
Research Institutes at NYPL and Metropolitan Museum, Watson Library - using online information to illuminate real documents and art objects, and vice-versa. 6 ____________ At the Met - exploring the relationship between art and information and art as information in both real and virtual. At
NYPL - exploring special collections through collection-based research
using real and virtual tools to bring new perspectives, contexts and information.
|
Going
to the Library to be a Virtual User -
7
Can you direct me to the Web collections? |
| Cross-modeling
Virtual Information Architecture to Real Library
Environments.
8
Libraries must more effectively use virtual information and environments to connect users to real collections and services. ![]() |
|
Using Web Sites for Intellectual Mapping, Communication of Content and Context, and Building Community, Provides New Options and opportunities for Libraries. This typical representation of the search process places three of the four tasks in a "pre-search" phase.
What's wrong with this process? 9 bwo contrasting information environments for online searching; each effects ISB differently. 1. Typical database search box = passive approach (negative) ![]() |
| 2. Medscape
information environment built around Medline
= active approach (positive) ![]() |
| Another look
at ISB defined for the traditional library in the "before
online" era, but still persists today.
"Success" depends on user acting upon system effectively without any outputs/communication from system to user. "Failure" usually occurs because the user can not visualize or grasp the system's knowledge base. 12 ![]() |
Virtual ISB
in Real Libraries - the study shows that:
13
|
|
SYSTEM INITIATED INFORMATION INTERACTION Because library IR systems have grown out of a bibliographic tradition, new types of IR systems are needed in which real and virtual interact and integrate rather than collide. An IR system needs to be a two-way information exchange where the system initiates interaction. Web sites should be used as an overlay to a database (knowledge base). This study and others show that users need be able to visualize content and understand context of a system's knowledge base. This can be achieved using Internet/Web capabilities for display and communication. ISB studies remain
focused on classic models of IR - filling search boxes with search terms,
seeking ways to increase relevance of results, where users carry out standard
search tasks as prescribed over decades.
|
| Thinking out
of the Box - placing
information retrieval and information seeking in the new Internet/Web environment
where new tools for information display and organization combine with virtual
reality and digital media to create dynamic information environments.
|
| Who will develop
the library's new Web sites for content and context visualization, intellectual
mapping, communication and service?
16
|
![]() Transforming information systems into Virtual Learning Environments through Internet and Web Technologies -
|